Photo by Juanjo Jaramillo on Unsplash
Test automation is key for delivering high-quality software efficiently. Automated tests allow you to catch bugs early, increase test coverage, and accelerate releases. Two popular open-source test automation tools are Puppeteer vs Selenium. But which one should you choose for your project? This comprehensive guide examines the pros, cons, and key differences between Puppeteer and Selenium to help you decide.
Also Read: HQpotner Key Features, Benefits & More
What is Puppeteer?
Puppeteer is a Google developed Node.js library to control headless Chrome and Chromium. It permits you to programmatically initialize browser instances and navigate websites as a real user would. With Puppeteer, you can:
- Generate screenshots and PDFs of pages
- Crawl websites for SEO, testing, or scraping purposes
- Automate form submissions, clicks, scrolling, and other interactions
- Run tests headlessly on CI services.
Puppeteer launches Google Chrome in headless mode. Headless mode runs the browser without the full interface. It’s faster and more lightweight since rendering occurs on the command line.
Key Puppeteer features
- Headless browser testing
- Fast and lightweight
- Page screenshotting
- Network throttling
- Built-in device emulation
- Automatic waiting for elements
- Access to browser console and events
- Support for extensions
What is Selenium?
Selenium is the older, more established browser automation framework. It has bindings for many languages like Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, and more.
Selenium allows controlling normal browsers instead of just headless Chromium. It supports automating interactions in web pages and gathering data just like Puppeteer.
Key Selenium features
- Cross-browser testing
- Mobile testing through Appium
- Large user community
- Mature ecosystem of tools
- Element locator strategies like XPath and CSS selectors
- Integration with testing frameworks
- Supports grid for distributed testing
Unlike Puppeteer, Selenium launches installed browsers on the operating system. This allows seeing tests execute visually. But it comes with a performance hit compared to headless execution.
Key Differences
Although Puppeteer and Selenium overlap in functionality, there are some major differences to consider:
Browser Support
- Puppeteer only supports Chromium-based browsers.
- Selenium supports Chrome, Firefox, Safari, IE, and more.
Programming Languages
- Puppeteer only has official Node.js bindings. Ports exist for Python and .NET but with limited support.
- Selenium has native bindings for Java, C#, Python, JavaScript, Ruby, PHP, and more.
Headless Testing
- Chrome will be started headless automatically by Puppeteer in this case for a quick and uncomplicated process.
- The Selenium is capable of working on headless systems but it makes more sense to use it being a primary GUI automating tool.
Mobile Testing
- Concurrently, Puppeteer indeed is not suitable for mobile app testing support.
- Using Selenium you can test and automate your Appium-based mobile apps both for Android and for iOS.
Also Read: Secure Coding Practices: Mitigating Vulnerability and Ensuring Software Security
Community & Documentation
- We have a smaller fan population because our audience is new.
- Selenium’s strong community and abundance of documentation is undoubtedly big.
Conclusion
Puppeteer and Selenium two tools among the others are good to go ahead with browser automation for web application testing purpose. It is because of this varying set of sets of parameters that one needs to be cautious with these processes.
Prominent criteria must be examined you will see the language support, headless vs visual testing, the browser coverage, and so on. By extracting the resources that are available try to use the Selenium experts. Assess these factors while you are determining for your case, either it is Selenium vs Puppeteer which one you use.
